On the eve of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games, the events industry is aiming high, but so are pollution and criticism. Given its significant economic impact (32 billion euros in 2019 according to EY), the events industry, from seminars to festivals and trade shows, must undertake a responsible transformation and accelerate its decarbonization trajectory, or risk moving in the wrong direction.
The first step in this decarbonization trajectory is measuring the emissions of your event.
But how to perform this calculation? What are the standards and references? What emission sources should be considered? Follow the guide!
The calculation of an event's carbon footprint is governed by various evolving standards and references to better address climate challenges. Initially defined by the British Standards Institute (BSI) in the context of the carbon neutrality standard, new references have emerged. Here are the main ones:
In France, the Climate and Resilience Law, effective January 1, 2023, provides a regulatory framework for climate communication. To prevent "greenwashing" risks, companies can no longer claim "carbon neutrality" (or any equivalent expression) of a product or service in France without providing access on their website and via a QR code or link on the product or advertisement to a summary report detailing:
Additionally, following ADEME's recommendation, it is advised not to use the term “carbon neutral” for your products or services, as this expression is imprecise or misleading if it does not meet the requirements of the Climate and Resilience Law mentioned above. Prefer mentioning a contribution to carbon neutrality (a dynamic and collective commitment) when highlighting your decarbonization trajectory.
Since you can't decarbonize what you don't measure, how do you proceed with the calculation? What data should be considered when organizing events? Let's get to the heart of the matter.
The principle of carbon calculation relies on the collection of activity data, which is then multiplied by emission factors (EF) that convert this activity data into CO2e emissions (e.g., 2.7 kgCO2e per liter of gasoline) to obtain the carbon footprint of the activity or event. For those who haven’t read our responsible event glossary, an EF is a ratio between a unit of good or service and the amount of greenhouse gas emitted in consuming that unit of product or service. The EFs are multiplied by the quantity of goods or services to obtain a result in tons or kg of CO2e.
Here are the main specific emission sources for events to consider:
The Bilan Carbone®, initially developed by ADEME and now managed by the Association for Low Carbon Transition, is the most well-known and widely used method in France. The term has since become part of everyday language. The method includes five key steps within a given scope (product, service, organization…) such as stakeholder engagement, carbon footprint measurement within the defined scope, identification of reduction measures and implementation of a decarbonization trajectory for continuous improvement, communication, and transparency.
To categorize greenhouse gas emissions by source or type of activity of a company, and to frame the scope of the Bilan Carbone®, different scopes must be considered. Generally, three main scopes can be distinguished:
The organizational scope includes all stakeholders necessary for organizing and executing the event. This scope helps identify all suppliers and stakeholders that you will need to contact during the data collection phase, as they hold, through their service or involvement in the event, part of the carbon footprint of your event and therefore the necessary data for its calculation.
The operational scope of an event's carbon footprint applies to the emitting activities inherent to organizing the event. It includes:
The emissions of an event are mainly related to its scope 3 (indirect emissions not related to energy production or purchase). The energy produced (scope 1) and purchased (scope 2) by the venue is rarely under the event organizer's control. Other categories of activities or emission sources concerning other service providers are also included in scope 3.
Unlike a company's activities, which are relatively continuous, an event takes place over a short period, so you need to anticipate data collection as much as possible to ensure an accurate estimate of the event's carbon footprint.
Moreover, your service providers offer time-limited services (this also applies to you concerning participants and the advertiser if applicable), so you must anticipate the data collection need for each stakeholder (including participants) and transmit the appropriate request as early as possible (via the specifications and project exchanges, notably), ideally from the event's conception phase.
To robustly evaluate and assess the carbon footprint of your event over its entire scope, we recommend evaluating them based on two criteria:
For each source, you can answer the following question: Can my event take place as planned if I remove this flow/source? If the answer is no, I must keep the flow/source and calculate its impact. If the answer is yes, I can remove the flow/source from my calculation scope. It will be easier to reduce the footprint on the sources you are responsible for rather than those you are dependent on, although it is important to try to reduce the latter as much as possible.
There are different approaches to evaluating GHG emissions, depending on your level of maturity in carbon accounting and the quality of the data available to you. Each approach associates activity data with emission factors to calculate the GHG emissions associated with an activity. To obtain the most accurate carbon footprint possible, and especially to analyze the footprint and identify emission reduction areas, it is important to have the most representative data of the physical reality of your activity. Since it is sometimes difficult to obtain precise data on all your emission sources, you should prioritize your time investment on the most emissive sources.
This approach involves calculating a greenhouse gas emission by considering the consumption of a good or service (activity data) and a specific emission factor representative of the good or service consumed. This approach offers better accuracy if the activity data is known and the emission factor representative.
This approach involves calculating a greenhouse gas emission by considering the cost of a good or service and an average emission factor for the cost of goods or services. The accuracy is lower due to the variations in the price of a good or service.
Imagine we are organizing a two-day seminar for 100 people with a gala dinner. Here is an example of an event's carbon footprint:
By focusing efforts on the main emission sources (scope 3), such as participant transport, we can reduce the carbon footprint. For instance, encouraging carpooling or train travel can significantly lower emissions. Additionally, sourcing local and seasonal food for catering and using sustainable materials for the setup can further reduce the event's overall carbon footprint.
By following these guidelines and leveraging available standards and references, you can accurately measure and subsequently reduce the carbon footprint of your events, contributing to a more sustainable events industryc